DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20221815
Published: 2022-07-27

Accuracy of foot length, head, chest, mid-arm and calf circumference for the diagnosis of low birth weight in Ile-Ife

Osagie J. Ugowe, Ebunoluwa A. Adejuyigbe, Oluwagbemiga O. Adeodu, Olusola Fajobi, Olaide O. Ugowe

Abstract


Background: Statistics from the Nigeria demographic and health survey (NDHS) 2018 revealed that about 59% of women delivered at home and only 24% of babies were weighed at birth. Subsequently, many small babies may have been missed. It is therefore necessary to identify alternative and effective surrogates to birth weight especially in places where weighing scales are not available through the use of simple and familiar tools.

Methods: It was a descriptive cross-sectional study involving the measurement of birth weight, occipitofrontal circumference (OFC), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), chest circumference (ChC), calf circumference (CC) and foot length (FL). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine degree of relationship between the anthropometric parameters and low birth weight. Cut-off values (with the highest sensitivity and specificity) were determined and diagnostic accuracy was performed using the area under the receiver’s operating characteristics (ROC) curve.

Results: All anthropometric measurements correlated positively with birth weight. With each unit increase in the MUAC, the odds for low-birth weight outcome decreased with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.099 (95% CI 0.045-0.213; p<0.001). Cut-offs and area under the curve (AUC) values for OFC, MUAC, chest circumference, calf circumference and foot length were 32.9 cm, 9.8 cm, 30.2 cm, 9.8 cm and 7.4 cm; and 0.93, 0.97, 0.96, 0.96 and 0.92 respectively.

Conclusions: MUAC had the best predictive performance in detecting low birth weight. The findings of this study provide an opportunity for early identification of low birth weight especially among out-of-facility births so that life-saving interventions can be instituted early.

 


Keywords


Anthropometry, Surrogate marker, ROC curve, Low-birth weight, Cut-off

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kinney MV, Kerber KJ, Black RE, Cohen B, Nkrumah F, Coovadia H, et al. Sub- Saharan Africa’s mothers, newborns and children: where and why do they die? PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000294.

Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waisawa P, et al Every Newborn: progress, priorities and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384:189-205.

National Population Commission (Nigeria). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, Maryland: National Population Commission and ICF. 2019.

Adejuyigbe EA, Fasuba BO, Onayade OO. Anthropometric parameters as predictors of low birth weight in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Nig J Health Sci. 2006;5:12-6, 2006;6(1-2):12-6.

Gozal D, Ndombo PK, Minkade JZ, Kago I, Tetanye E, Mbede J. Anthropometric measurements in a newborn population in West Africa: a reliable and simple tool for the identification of infants at risk for early postnatal morbidity. J Pediatr. 1991;118:800-5.

Lunde A, Melve KK, Gjessing HK, Skjaerven, Irgens LM. Genetic and environmental influence on birth weight, birth length, head circumference and gestational age by use of population-based parent-offspring data. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:734-41.

Ndu IK, Ibeziako SN, Obidike EO, Adimora GN, Edelu BO, Chinawa JM, et al. Chest and occipitofrontal circumference measurements in the detection of low birth weight among Nigerian newborns of Igbo ethnicity Ital J Pediatr. 2014;40:81.

Ezeaka VC, Egri-Okwaji MT, Renner JK, Grange AO Anthropometric measurements in detection of low-birth weight infants in Lagos. Niger Post Grad Med. 2003;10:168-72.

Chukwudi NK, Nwokeukwu HI, Adimorah GN. Use of Simple anthropometric measurements to identify low-birth weight infants in Enugu, Nigeria. Glob Pediatr Health. 2018;5:1-8.

Ashish K, Nelin V, Vitrakoti R, Aryal S, Malqvist M. Validation of the foot length measure as an alternative tool to identify low birth weight and preterm babies in a low-resource setting like Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMC Paed. 2015;15:43.

Otupiri E, Wobil P, Nguah SB, Hindin MJ. Anthropometric measurement: Options for identifying low birth weight newborns in Kumasi, Ghana. PLOS One. 2014;9(9):e106712.

Achebe C, Ugochukwu EF, Adogu POU, Ubajaka C. Prediction of low birth weight from other anthropometric parameters in Nnewi, south eastern Nigeria. Niger J Paed. 2014;41(1):59-63.

Boghossian NS, Geraci M, Edwards EM, Marrow KA, Horbar JD. Anthropometric charts for infants born between 22 and 29weeks’ gestation. Paediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20161641.

Kandraju H, Agrawal S, Geetha K, Sujatha L, Subramanian S, Murki S. Gestational age-specific centile charts for anthropometry at birth for South Indian infants. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49(3):199-202.

Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K. New Ballard Score: expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119:417-23.

Noel-Weiss J, Courant G, Woodend AK. Physiological weight loss in breast-fed neonates: A systematic review. Open Med. 2008;2:e99-110.

Villar J, Ismail SC, Cesar GV, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn cross-sectional study of the intergrowth-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857-68.

NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre. Procedure for making Circumference Measurements of Infants. BRC Standard Operating Procedure for making circumference measurements of infants. 2015;2.

Intergrowth-21st Anthropometry Group. Anthropometry Manual for the intergrowth-21st Project. Available at https://intergrowth21.org.uk/. Accessed 2022, May 2.

Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 1963;32:793-800.

Hauke J, Kossowski T. Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae. 2011;30(2):87-93.

Simundic AM. Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions EJIFCC. 2009;19(4):203-11.

Habibzadeh F, Habibzadeh P, Yadollahie M. On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(3):297-307.

Cleves MA. From the help desk: Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristics curves for two or more probit or logit models. Stata. 2002;2(3):301-13.

Modibbo MH, Taura MG. Regression equations for birth weight estimation using anthropometric measurements of hand and foot of Hausa new born babies in Kano- Nigeria. BAJOPAS. 2013;6(1):186-9.

Hadush MY, Berhe AH, Medhanyie AA. Foot length, chest and head circumference measurements in detection of low-birth weight neonates in Mekelle, Ethiopia: a hospital based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:111.

Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. MMJ. 2012;24(3):69-71.

Das JC, Afroze A, Khanam ST, Paul N. Mid-arm circumference: an alternative measure for screening low birth weight babies. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2005;31:1-6.

Gotto E. Meta-analysis to estimate the correlation coefficients between birth weight and other anthropometric measurements at birth. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78(3):311-8.

Kaur M, Singh Z, Kaur G, Goyal LD. Correlation of birth weight with other anthropometric measurements of new borns. IJBAMR. 2013;8(2):870-9.

Soundarya M, Basavaprabhu A, Raghuveera K, Baliga B, Shivanagaraja B. Comparative assessment of foetal malnutrition by anthropometry and CAN score. Iran J Pediatr. 2012;22(1):70-6.

McHugh ML. The odds ratio: calculation, usage and interpretation. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2009;19:120-6.

Pereira-da-Silva L. Neonatal Anthropometry: A tool to evaluate the nutritional status and predict early and late risks. Handbook of Anthropometry. 2012;65:1079-104.

Srinivasa S, Manasa G, Madhu GN. Foot length of newborn: Its correlation with gestational age and various anthropometric parameters. Curr Pediatr Res. 2017;21(2):248-53.

Nabiwemba EL, Orach GC, Kolsteren P. Determining an anthropometric surrogate measure for identifying low birth weight babies in Uganda: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. BMC Paediatr. 2013;13:54.

Sheikh AR, Thakre SS, Thakre S, Patir CR, Petkar PB. Evaluation of Calf circumference as a procedure to screen low birth weight babies: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017;4(6):2065-9.

Thi HN, Khanh DKT, Thu HT, Thomas EG, Lee KJ, Russell FM. Foot-length, Chest circumference and mid upper arm circumference are good predictors of low birth weight and prematurity in ethnic minority newborns in Vietnam: A hospital-based observational study. PloS One. 2015;10(11):e0142420.

Ahmed S, Mitra S, Chowdhury A, Camacho L, Winikoff B, Sloan N. Community Kangaroo Mother Care: implementation and potential for neonatal survival and health in very low-income settings. J Perinatol. 2011;31:361-7.