Psychometric properties of the Indonesian online version of fertility quality of life tool: a cross-sectional study

Authors

  • Fitri Damayanti Doctoral Program, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Hakimi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Mochamad Anwar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Diah Ayu Puspandari Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20211944

Keywords:

Fertility, Indonesia, Quality of life, Validity, Reliability

Abstract

Background: The clinical measurement of an infertile couple’s quality of life (QoL) should be considered as a standard assessment of their pretreatment condition to aid in medical and psychological consultation. The study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Indonesian online version of the fertility quality-of-life (FertiQoL) questionnaire.

Methods: This study applied cross-sectional methods among women/men over 18 years who have problems with infertility and have or have not undergone any medical treatment. PT. Integra Inovasi Indonesia helped develop the online FertiQoL questionnaire. This research applied R project version 3.6.3 to merge the data and conduct statistical analyses. Pearson correlation tests were used to ensure the validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient test was also used to measure the instrument’s quality and reliability.

Results: There were 214 participants enrolled from all over Indonesia. The total scores for core FertiQoL and treatment FertiQoL were 64.72±13.87 and 62.93±12.50, respectively. The total FertiQoL mean was 64.14±12.33. The reliability of the FertiQoL version of the Indonesian language was relatively high (Cronbach α was 0.92, and the value for each domain was >0.70 (0.76-0.94). The validity results of the FertiQoL questionnaire also showed that all question items were considered valid (r>0.1341).

Conclusions: The Indonesian version of FertiQoL is valid and reliable for assessment of the pre-treatment condition of infertile couples and the effects of treatment on QoL in infertile patients which can help in making more accurate diagnosis and providing diagnosis and treatment in infertility clinics.  

References

WHO. Infecundity, Infertility and Childlessness in Developing Countries: DHS Comparative Report No.9. WHO; 2004.

Jones HW, Cooke I, Kempers R, Brinsden P, Saunders D. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95(2):491.

Kementerian KRI. Data dan Info: Profil Kesehatan Indonesia, 2017. Available at: https://pusdatin.kemkes.go.id/folder/view/01/structure-publikasi-data-pusat-data-dan-informasi.html. Accessed on 21 April 2021.

Vo TM, Tran Q, Le CV, Do TT, Le TM. Depression and associated factors among infertile women at Tu Du hospital, Vietnam: a cross-sectional study. IJWH. 2019;11:343-51.

Quillan J, Torres SRA, Greil AL. Infertility and life satisfaction among women. J Family Issues. 2007;28(7):955-81.

Boivin J, Schmidt L. Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(6):1745-52.

Palomba S, Daolio J, Romeo S, Battaglia FA, Marci R, La Sala GB. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):113.

Agostini F, Monti F, Andrei F, Paterlini M, Palomba S, La SGB. Assisted reproductive technology treatments and quality of life: a longitudinal study among subfertile women and men. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(10):1307-15.

Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Amini P, Omani Samani R. Psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life instrument in Iranian infertile women. IJFS. 2017;10(4).

Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K, Boivin J. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertility and Sterility. 2015;104(2):440-51.

Osapay G, Osapay K. A Stress and fertility. Orvosi Hetilap. 2015;156(35):1430-4.

Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Human Reproduction. 2011;26(8):2084-91.

Brysbaert M. How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments?: a tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. J Cognition. 2019;2(1):16.

Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48(6):1273-96.

Koert E, Takefman J, Boivin J. Fertility quality of life tool: update on research and practice considerations. Hum Fertil. 2019;1-13.

Santulli P, Bourdon M, Presse M, Gayet V, Marcellin L, Prunet C, Ziegler D, et al. Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):978-87.

Santoro N, Eisenberg E, Trussell JC, Craig LB, Gracia C, Huang H, et al. Fertility-related quality of life from two RCT cohorts with infertility: unexplained infertility and polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2268-79.

Cserepes RE, Korosi T, Bugan A. Characteristics of infertility specific quality of life in Hungarian couples. Orvosi Hetil. 2014;155(20):783-8.

Sexty RE, Hamadneh J, Rosner S, Strowitzki T, Ditzen B, Toth B, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of fertility specific quality of life in German, Hungarian and Jordanian couples attending a fertility center. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:27.

Valsangkar S, Bodhare T, Bele S, Sai S. An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(2):80-5.

Madero S, Gameiro S, García D, Cirera D, Vassena R, Rodríguez A. Quality of life, anxiety and depression of German, Italian and French couples undergoing cross-border oocyte donation in Spain. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1862-70.

Donarelli Z, Lo CG, Gullo S, Salerno L, Marino A, Sammartano F, et al. The Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire (FertiQoL) Relational subscale: psychometric properties and discriminant validity across gender. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(9):2061-71.

Chan CHY, Lau HPB, Tam MYJ, Ng EHY. A longitudinal study investigating the role of decisional conflicts and regret and short-term psychological adjustment after IVF treatment failure. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2772-80.

Lo SS, Kok W. Sexual functioning and quality of life of Hong Kong Chinese women with infertility problem. Human Fertility. 2016;19(4):268-74.

Aarts JW, Huppelschoten AG, Empel IW, Boivin J, Verhaak CM, Kremer JA, et al. How patient-centred care relates to patients' quality of life and distress: a study in 427 women experiencing infertility. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):488-95.

Holter H, Sandin BAK, Gejervall AL, Wikland M, Wilde LB, et al. Quality of care in an IVF programme from a patient’s perspective: development of a validated instrument. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):534-47.

Pedro J, Canavarro MC, Boivin J, Gameiro S. Positive experiences of patient-centred care are associated with intentions to comply with fertility treatment: findings from the validation of the Portuguese version of the PCQ-Infertility tool. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2462-72.

Peterson RA. A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. J Consum Res. 1994;21(2):381.

Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Amini P, Omani Samani R. Psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life instrument in infertile Iranian women. Int J Fertil Steril. 2017;10(4):371-9.

Kahyaoglu SH, Balkanli KP. Quality of life in women with infertility via the FertiQoL and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Nurs Health Sci. 2015;17(1):84-9.

Skevington SM, Lotfy M, Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299-310.

Schuler M, Musekamp G, Bengel J, Nolte S, Osborne RH, Faller H. Measurement invariance across chronic conditions: a systematic review and an empirical investigation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQTM). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):56.

Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AWM, Kremer JAM, Kraaimaat FW, et al. Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Human Reproduction Update. 2007;13(1):27-36.

Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosomatic Obstet Gynecol. 2010;31(2):101-10.

Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K, Boivin J. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):440-51.

Huppelschoten AG, Van DAJCM, Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Kremer JAM, Nelen WLDM. Differences in quality of life and emotional status between infertile women and their partners. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2168-76.

Gameiro S, Canavarro MC, Boivin J. Patient centred care in infertility health care: Direct and indirect associations with wellbeing during treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(3):646-54.

Asazawa K. Effects of a partnership support program for couples undergoing fertility treatment. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015;12(4):354-66.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-25

How to Cite

Damayanti, F., Hakimi, M., Anwar, M., & Puspandari, D. A. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Indonesian online version of fertility quality of life tool: a cross-sectional study. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 8(6), 2768–2778. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20211944

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles