DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20200451

Prevalence of caesarean section and womens' attitude towards caesarean section in Manipur, North-Eastern India

Joymati Oinam, Shantibala Kongjenbam, Yumnam Ningthemba Singh

Abstract


Background: The rapid increase of caesarean section (CS) rate throughout the world has become a serious public health issue since the level of CS is well above the WHO (1985) recommended 15% and it is increasing over time. Objectives of the study was to determine the prevalence of caesarean section and women’s attitudes towards CS, to investigate rural-urban differences and any associated factors between attitude with socio-demographic factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in urban and rural areas of three districts of Manipur from 2015 to 2017 among 600 eligible married women aged 18-35 years selected by simple random sampling. Household was taken as sampling unit and electoral roll (2013) as sampling frame. An interview schedule was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics like mean, SD, proportion and inferential statistics like χ2 test was used. p-value 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: Mean age of the participants was 29.7±4.6 years. The overall prevalence of CS rate was 18.5% and the first child CS rate was 19.9% and majority of them belongs to 30-35 age groups. Majority of the women (84.2%) have neutral attitude and only 7.6% have favorable attitude towards CS. Favorable attitude towards CS was more among women who married at ≥30 years, whose husband was >30 years and was a government employee and who ever had CS.

Conclusions: Although the prevalence of CS is well above the WHO (1985) recommendation. Majority still preferred vaginal delivery and the demand for CS is low in the present setting.

 


Keywords


Attitude, Caesarean section, Manipur, Prevalence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arjun G. Caesarean section: Evaluation, guidelines and recommendations. Ind J Med Ethics. 2008;5(3):117-20.

International Institute for Population Sciences and ORC Macro, Report of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-III). Mumbai: IIPS; 2006. Available at: http://www.rchiips.org /nfhs/nfhs3.shtml. Accessed 10 September 2015.

Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2002;79(2):151-8.

Ajeet S, Jaydeep N, Nandkishore K, Nisha R. Women’s knowledge, perceptions, and potential demand towards caesarean section. Nati J Commun Med. 2011;2(2):244-8.

Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BW. High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population‐based cross-sectional study. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2003;110(2):106-11.

Yamasmit W, Chaithongwongwatthana S. Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2012;95(5):619.

Danso KA, Schwandt HM, Turpin CA, Seffah JD, Samba A, Hindin MJ. Preference of Ghanaian women for vaginal or caesarean delivery postpartum. Ghana Med J. 2009;43(1):29.

Dey N, Hatai SK. A study of caesarean section cases with special reference to maternal and neonatal outcome. J Ind Med Assoc. 1992 Jun;90(6):149-51.

Roberts CL, Algert CS, Ford JB, Todd AL, Morris JM. Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001725.

Ashimi AO, Amole TG, Aliyu LD. Knowledge and attitude of pregnant women to caesarean section in a semi-urban community in northwest Nigeria. J West African Coll Surg. 2013;3(2):46.

Aali BS, Motamedi B. Women’s knowledge and attitudes towards modes of delivery in Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Medit Health J 2005;11(4):663-72.

Ryding EL. Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean section for personal reasons. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scandin. 1993;72(4):280-5.

Saisto T, Ylikorkala O, Halmesmäki E. Factors associated with fear of delivery in second pregnancies. Obstetr Gynecol. 1999;94(5):679-82.