DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20195501

Understanding the metrics used to assess the quality of journals

Vineet Kumar Pathak, Mohan Kumar M.

Abstract


Various databases offer access to thousands of academic journals. A miscellaneous picture with respect to quality, scientific influence and prestige is presented by umpteen numbers of journals present. Authors wishing to publish their research aim to publish in journals with the highest ratings and are ultimately in no man’s land.

Keywords


Journal metrics, Quality of journals, Impact factor, H-index, G-index, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Eigenfactor

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cornillier F, Charles V. Measuring the attractiveness of academic journals: a direct influence aggregation model. Oper Res Lett. 2015;43(2):172–6.

Lowry PB, Moody GD, Gaskin J, Galletta D, Humphreys S, Barlow JB, et al. Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars’ Journal Basket via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value?. Social Sci Res Network; 2013: 2186798.

Lowry PB, Romans D, Curtis AM. Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: a scientometric study of information systems journals. Social Sci Res Network. 2005: 666145.

Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW. How to rank journals. Dorta-González P, editor. Plos One. 2016;11(3):e0149852.

Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P, Ramasamy J. Assessment of the quality of a journal: Scientific approach. Int J Adv Med Health Res. 2015;2(1):61.

The Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor. Web of Science Group. Available at: https://clarivate.com/ webofsciencegroup/essays/impact-factor/. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314(7079):497.

Journal Citation Reports: 5-Year Impact Factors. Available at: https://support.clarivate.com/Scient ificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Journal-Citation-Reports-5-Year-Impact-Factors?language=en_US. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Izet M. H-index and how to improve it? Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;10(1):83–9.

AL-Fatlawi AA. Development G-Index and H-Index : Dgh-Index. Available at: https://pdfs.Sema nticscholar.org/5eff/abdfcba850aa4f1223f3eb5bc8de23054b01.pdf. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

An improvement of the H-index: the g-index - Semantic Scholar. Available at: https://www. semanticscholar.org/paper/An-improvement-of-the-h-index%3A-the-g-index-Egghe/bdca34b16ccefe61 901c167402b9ff73e0c6629e. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Hodge DR, Lacasse JR. Evaluating journal quality: is the h-index a better measure than impact factors?. Res Soc Work Pract. 2011;21(2):222–30.

Costas R, Bordons M. The h-index: advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J Informetr. 2007;1(3):193–203.

Bornmann L, Daniel HD. The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep. 2009;10(1):2–6.

Gusenbauer M. Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics. 2019;118(1):177–214.

Google Scholar Metrics Help. Available at: https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Eldermire E. LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: G-Index. Available at: //guides.library. cornell.edu/c.php?g=32272&p=203392. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Noruzi A. Impact Factor, h-index, i10-index and i20-index of Webology. Available at: http://www.webology.org/2016/v13n1/editorial21.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Sept 6]

Elsevier. CiteScore: A new metric to help you track journal performance and make decisions. Editors’ Update. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/ editors-update/story/journal-metrics/citescore-a-new-metric-to-help-you-choose-the-right-journal. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Elsevier releases 2018 CiteScoreTM values. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/science-and-technology/elsevier-releases-2018-citescore-values. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Measuring a journals impact. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/ measuring-a-journals-impact. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Elsevier Journal Metrics Visualization. Helping Authors. Visualizing Key Metrics. Delivering Journal Insights. Available at: https://journalin sights.elsevier.com/journals/0969-806X/snip. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Journal Metrics in Scopus: Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP). Elsevier Scopus Blog. Available at: https://blog.scopus.com/posts/journal-metrics-in-scopus-source-normalized-impact-per-paper-snip. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Falagas ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R, Karageorgopoulos DE. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J. 2008;22(8):2623–8.

Journal Metrics in Scopus: SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), Elsevier Scopus Blog. Available at: https://blog.scopus.com/posts/journal-metrics-in-scopus-scimago-journal-rank-sjr. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. J Informetr. 2012;6(4):674–88.

Tchangalova N. Research guides: bibliometrics and altmetrics: measuring the impact of knowledge: Eigenfactor. Available at: //lib.guides.umd.edu/ bibliometrics/eigenfactor. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

Eldermire E. LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: Eigenfactor and Article Influence. Available at: //guides.library.cornell.edu/c.php?g=32272&p= 203396. Accessed on 6 September 2019.

A Closer Look at the EigenfactorTM Metrics. Web of Science Group. 2017. Available at: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/blog/closer-look-eigenfactor-metrics/. Accessed on 6 September 2019.