A descriptive study to understand how severity of symptoms after completion of treatment impact on the life of oral cancer patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20191387Keywords:
Oral cancer, EORTC QLQ H and N 35, Symptoms, Quality of lifeAbstract
Background: Oral cancer is a commonly occurring cancer among Indians, who are mostly habituated to chewing tobacco. It accounts for around 30–40% of all malignant tumors in India and has one of the lowest five years survival rates, as most of them are diagnosed in advanced stages. More so, after the treatment is completed, the patients’ still suffers from a number of symptoms, which are often not taken seriously. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of severity of symptomatology of oral cancer after completion of cancer treatment.
Methods: EORTC (European organization for research and treatment of cancer) H and N 35 questionnaire (Marathi version) was used to assess the severity of clinical symptoms. 100 consecutive patients of oral cancer who had completed their treatment and came for follow up after 1 to 3 months of treatment completion were enrolled for the study after taking informed written consent. The study was initiated after obtaining ethical approval from the institutional ethics committee. Statistical analysis was done using R software.
Results: Age of the patient, status of insurance, time gap between symptom onset and diagnosis, socio-economic status and stage of oral cancer were included in the final model of multivariate analysis. Time gap between symptom onset and diagnosis (in months) was also found to be associated significantly to head and neck symptoms. Participants from higher socio-economic status were found to have fewer head and neck symptoms and this association was found statistically significant.
Conclusions: Assessment of severity of symptomatology should be routinely practiced among patients who had completed their treatment and come for follow up. This needs to be followed by guidance and individualized interventions for improving the quality of life of the treated patients.
References
Conway DI, Petticrew M. Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2811-9.
Allgar VL, Neal RD. Sociodemographic factors and delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: Analysis of data from the 'National Survey of NHS Patients. British J Cancer. 2005;92:1971-5.
Gupta S, Singh R, Gupta OP, Tripathi A. Prevalence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions and the association with numerous risk factors in North India: A hospital based study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2014;5(2):142-8.
World Health Organization (1994) The WHO Health Promotion Glossary. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
Farquhar M. Definitions of quality of life: A taxonomy. J Advance Nur. 1995;22:502-8.
Morton RP, Izzard ME. Quality-of-life outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. World J Surg. 2003;27:884-9.
Kazi R, Cordova J. Quality of life following total laryngectomy: Assessment using the UW-QOL scales. ORL J Otorhinolaryngology Relat Spec. 2007;69:100-6.
Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, De Graeff A, Groenvold M, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. EORTC Qual Life Gr. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/71d3/ de2b6d58bf321da160a43a99777538a206d8.pdf%0Ahttp://groups.eortc.be/qol/sites/default/files/img/newsletter/reference_values_manual2008.pdf. Accessed on 12 January 2019.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epi Info, 2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ epiinfo/index.html. Accessed on 12 January 2019.
Team RC. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: Http://Www.R-Project.Org/. Vienna, Austria; 2013. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed on 12 January 2019.
Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505.
Shavi GR, Thakur B, Bhambal A, Jain S, Singh V, Shukla A. Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Patients of Head and Neck Cancer Attending Cancer Hospital of Bhopal City, India. J Int oral Heal JIOH. 2015;7(8):21–7.
Indian Council of Medical Research. Consolidated Report of Hospital Based Cancer Registries An Assessment of the Burden and Care of Cancer Patients: 2012-14. Available at: http://www .ncrpindia.org/. Accessed on 12 January 2019.
Mathur PT, Dayal P, Pai KM. Correlation of Clinical Patterns of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Age, Site, Sex and Habits. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2011;23(2):81–5.
Narwal A, Devi A, Bharti A, Yadav, Bhogal A. Original Research Epidemiological and Clinico-Pathological Study of Oral Cancers in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: An Institutional Study in Haryana. Int J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2014;5(3):2-6.
Coelho KR. Challenges of the oral cancer burden in India. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:1–17.
Shuman A, Yang Y. End-of-life care among head and neck cancer patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144.
Christopher KM, Osazuwa-Peters N, Dougherty R, Indergaard SA, Popp C, Walker R, et al. Impact of treatment modality on quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: Findings from an academic medical institution. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017;38(2):168-73.
