DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20185270

Density of in-vitro fertilization centers and its correlation with socioeconomic factors in Maharashtra state, India

Prakash Prabhakarrao Doke, Daya Krishan Mangal, Anuja Gulati

Abstract


Background: The infertility due to various reasons is increasing and correspondingly the number in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers is also increasing. Some procedures in these centers can deliver desired sex of the unborn child. The gender discrimination in India has already resulted unfavorable child sex ratio for girls. Maharashtra is one of the badly affected states. It is feared that the child sex ratio may further decline due to IVF centers. The study was carried out to measure correlation between number of IVF centers with various indicators of sex ratio infertility, and some socio-economic factors.

Methods: The study was conducted in 2014 using secondary data. District wise internet search by using words ‘In-Vitro Fertilization center’ and ‘infertility treatment center’ was carried out. Whenever IVF center/procedure was noticed on the internet, the center with its address was included in that district list.

Results: There was positive correlation between IVF centers and urbanization, per capita income, female literacy and negative correlation with population sex ratio and no correlation with sex ratio at birth or child sex ratio. The best correlation was observed with urbanization, which explains the observed correlation with other variables.

Conclusions: The number of IVF centers is not related with magnitude of infertility and not affecting sex ratio whereas IVF density seems to be an outcome of extent of urbanization.


Keywords


Sex ratio at birth, Population sex ratio, Urbanization, Female literacy rate, Per capita income, Infertility

Full Text:

PDF

References


International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) Mumbai. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08: India. 2010.

Ram U. Childlessness and Its Consequences in India: Levels, Patterns and Differentials. International Institute for Population Sciences. 2006.

Cave-Browne, John. Indian infanticide: its origin, progress, and suppression. London: W. H. Allen & Co. 1857.

George SM. Female Infanticide in Tamil Nadu, India: From Recognition Back to Denial. The International Women's Health Movement

Nagarajan R, Mulay S. Ultrasound sonography centres and CSR across Maharashtra. Artha Vijnana. 2008;50(4):433-48.

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Planning Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai. Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2013-14. 2014.

Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation. Per Capita National Income. 2015.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) Mumbai. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08: Maharashtra. 2010.

Deputy Registrar of Births and Deaths, Maharashtra. Annual report of Survey of Causes of Death 2011. Pune. 2013.

Deputy Registrar of Births and Deaths, Maharashtra, Pune. Civil Registration System: Provisional Abstract-2012. 2013.

Office of the Registrar General, India Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India New Delhi. Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2012. 2013.

Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility- a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):575-88.

Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):871-5.

ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Social determinants of human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1518-26.

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506-12.

Chandra A, Copen CE. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2013;67:1-19.

Gaur DS, Talekar MS, Pathak VP. Alcohol intake and cigarette smoking: impact of two major lifestyle factors on male fertility. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53(1):35-40.

Dama MS, Rajender S. Secular changes in the semen quality in India during the past 33 years. J Androl. 2012;33(4):740-4.

Wiener-Megnazi Z, Auslender R, Dirnfeld M. Advanced paternal age and reproductive outcome. Asian J Androl 2012; 14(1):69-76.

Cocuzza M, Alvarenga C, Pagani R. The epidemiology and etiology of azoospermia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 (Suppl 1):15-26.

The Hindu, Chennai. Fertility has taken a dip in South India: Survey. 2013, September 21.

Shamila S, Sasikala SL. Primary report on the risk factors affecting female infertility in South Indian districts of Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36:59-61.

Adamson PC, Krupp K, Freeman AH, Klausner JD, Reingold AL, Madhivanan P. Prevalence & correlates of primary infertility among young women in Mysore, India. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134:440-6.

United Nations Population Fund. Prevention and Management of Fertility in Primary Healthcare Settings: An Information Booklet for Policy Planners, Program Managers and Service Providers in Healthcare Systems. 2003.

Kamel RM. Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:21.

Puri CP, Hinduja I, Zaveri K. Need and feasibility of providing assisted technologies for infertility management in resource poor settings. ICMR Bulletin. 2000;30(6-7):55-62.

Parikh F. Sex-selection by IVF: detrimental to Indian women. Indian J Med Ethics. 1998;6(2):55.

Times of India. TNN. To ensure prized baby boy, Indians flock to Bangkok. 2012, December 27.

Basu M. Falling total fertility rate in Kolkata sets alarm bells ringing. Live Mint, December 25 2014.

Gentleman A. India's lost daughters: Abortion toll in millions. The New York Times January 9, 2006.

Jha P, Kumar R, Vasa P, Dhingra N, Thiruchelvam D, Moineddin R. Low female-to-male sex ratio of children born in India: national survey of 1.1 million households. Lancet. 2006;367(9506):211-8.

Trivers RL, Willard DE. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973;179(4068):90-2.

Dean JH, Chapman MG, Sullivan EA. The effect on human SRB by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures-an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2006. BJOG. 2010;117(13):1628-34.

Tarín JJ, García-Pérez MA, Hermenegildo C, Cano A. Changes in sex ratio from fertilization to birth in assisted-reproductive-treatment cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:56.

Check JH, Kwirenk D, Katsoff D, Press M, Breen E, Baker A. Male: female sex ratio in births resulting from IVF according to swim-up versus Percoll preparation of inseminated sperm. Arch Androl. 1994;33(1):63-5.

Maalouf WE, Mincheva MN, Campbell BK, Hardy IC. Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1321-5.

Bu Z, Chen ZJ, Huang G, Zhang H, Wu Q, Ma Y, et al. Live birth sex ratio after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in china - an analysis of 121,247 babies from 18 centers. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113522.

Palash IVF. The IVF Treatment Market in India. Available at: https://palashivf.com/2017/02/21/ivf-treatment-market-india/. Accessed 29 October 2018.

Okafor NI, Ezeah P, Udeobasi O. Factors Affecting the Use of In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) among Married Couples in Anambra State, Nigeria. Int J Innova Res Dev. 2015;4(9):10-8.

Aleyamma TK, Kamath MS, Muthukumar K, Mangalaraj AM, George K. Affordable ART: a different perspective. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3312-8.

Nadimpally S, Marwha V, Shenoy A. Globalization of birth markets: a case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India. Globalization and Health. 2011;7:27.