Public private mix in tuberculosis control: is it really working in India?

Authors

  • Ram Gopal Nautiyal 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Government Medical College Haldwani, Haldwani, Nainital, India
  • Rajesh Kumar Singh Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College Haldwani, Haldwani, Nainital, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20180258

Keywords:

TB, RNTCP, IMA, PPM

Abstract

Background: As significant proportions of the tuberculosis (TB) patients in India are managed by the private sector, integration of the private sector with the revised national tuberculosis control programme (RNTCP) is crucial to achieve TB control in the country. The RNTCP of India has been therefore involving allopathic private practitioners (PPs) since its beginning through its RNTCP- Indian Medical Association public-private mix (RNTCP-IMA PPM) project for inclusive involvement of PPs in the programme to fight against TB. The objectives of the study were to evaluate whether or not the RNTCP-IMA PPM project in India could mobilize the support of the allopathic private practitioners (PPs) by analyzing their knowledge and perception about RNTCP, and their readiness to support the programme.

Methods: A questionnaire based cross- sectional study was conducted in urban areas of districts of Kumaon division of Uttarakhand State of North India.

Results: Of 71 PPs, almost 83% knew that in RNTCP sputum acid fast bacillus (AFB) examination was the most important diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis, 66.2% knew that intermittent regimens under direct observation are practiced in RNTCP, 32.4% believed drug regimens in RNTCP of questionable efficacy, 29.6% felt ignored by the programme and only 2.8% felt RNTCP a successful strategy. 50.7% PPs showed readiness to support the programme with government support.

Conclusions: The RNTCP-IMA PPM project seems to have performed sub-optimally as majority (97.2%) PPs did not perceive RNTCP as a successful strategy. For successful RNTCP-IMA PPM, India needs to upscale the existing PPM with strong political will and administrative commitment. 

References

Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, TB India 2009, RNTCP status report.

Uplekar M, Juvekar S, Morankar S, Rangan S, Nunn P. Tuberculosis patients and practitioners in private clinics in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2(4):324-9.

Suganthi P, Chadha VK, Ahmed J, Umadevi G, Kumar P, Srivastava R, et al. Health seeking and knowledge about tuberculosis among persons with pulmonary symptoms and tuberculosis cases in Bangalore slums. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(11):1268–73.

Hazarika I. Role of Private Sector in Providing Tuberculosis Care:Evidence from a Population-based Survey in India. J Global Infect Dis. 2011;3(1):19-24.

Pinto LM, Udwadia ZF. Private patient perceptions about a public programme;what do private Indian tuberculosis patients really feel about directly observed treatment?. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:357-61.

Prasad R, Nautiyal RG, Mukherji PK, Jain A, Singh K, Ahuja RC. Treatment of new pulmonary tuberculosis patients:what do allopathic doctors do in India?. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6(10):895-902.

Udwadia ZF, Pinto LM, Uplekar MW. Tuberculosis Management by Private Practitioners in Mumbai, India:Has Anything Changed in Two Decades? PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8):e12023.

Uplekar MW, Shepard DS. Treatment of tuberculosis by private general practitioners in India. Tubercle. 1991;72(4):284-90.

Singla N, Sharma PP, Singla R, Jain RC. Survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices for tuberculosis among general practitioners in Delhi, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2(5):384-9.

The Centre for Health Research and Development (CHRD). Involvement of private practitioners in the RNTCP - the rationale, problems encountered and likely operational models. Health Admin. 2003;15(1-2):61-71.

Prasad R, Nautiyal RG, Mukherji PK, Jain A, Singh K, Ahuja RC. Diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis:what do doctors of modern medicine do in India? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003;7(1):52-7.

Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, TB India 2011, RNTCP status report.

World Health Organization. A brief history of tuberculosis control in India. Geneva, WHO 2010. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ 10665/44408/1/9789241500159_eng.pdf. Accessed on 14 November 2017.

Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC. Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Tech Learning, Performance J. 2001;19(1):43-50.

Social assessment study for RNTCP- Final Report, submitted to: Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Government of India ), New Delhi. ORG Centre for Social research 2003.

Lonnroth K, Uplekar M, Arora VK, Juvekar S, Nguyen TNL, Mwaniki D, et al. Public-private mix for DOTS implementation: what makes it work? Bull World Health Organization. 2004;82:580-6.

Dewan PK, Lal SS, Lonnroth K, Wares F, Uplekar M, Sahu S, et al. Improving tuberculosis control through public-private collaboration in India:literature review. BMJ. 2006;332:574-8.

Bhatia V. Enhancing private sector contribution to TB care in India. Samm health International. Funded by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria. 2010.

De Costa A, Kazmi T, Lönnroth K, Uplekar M, Diwan VK. PPM:'public-private' or 'private-public' mix? The case of Ujjain District, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(11):1333-5.

Basu M, Sinha D, Das P, Roy B, Biswas S, Chattopadhyay S. Knowledge and practice regarding pulmonary tuberculosis among private practitioners. Ind J Comm Health, 2013;25(4);403-12.

Dosumu EA. Survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding management of tuberculosis among general practitioners in Nigeria. Afr J Resp Med. 2008;1:17-9.

Azhar GS. DOTS for TB relapse in India:A systematic review. Lung India. 2012;29(2):147-53.

Salve S, Sheikh K, Porter JDH. Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(11):631–42.

Datta K, Bhatnagar T, Murhekar M. Private practitioners' knowledge, attitude and practices about tuberculosis, Hooghly district, India. Indian J Tuberc. 2010;57(4):199-206.

Thakur JS, Kar SS, Sehgal A, Kumar R. Private sector involvement in tuberculosis control in Chandigarh. Indian J Tuberc. 2006;53:149-53.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-24

How to Cite

Nautiyal, R. G., & Singh, R. K. (2018). Public private mix in tuberculosis control: is it really working in India?. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 5(2), 728–733. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20180258

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles