DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20163052

Socioeconomic and regional disparities in safe delivery in India (1990-2006)

Jeetendra Yadav, Shyama Gupta, Kh Jiten Kumar Singh

Abstract


Background: Giving birth to a child is not only a strain for the body, but it also puts the woman’s health at risk. Globally, nearly 300,000 thousand women die each year as a result of pregnancy related complications. India, with a population of more than 1.21 billion, has the highest maternal mortality in the world (estimated to be 56000 in 2010). Addressing the maternity care needs of women may have considerable ramifications for achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG)-5. The proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (safe delivery) is one of the main indicators used to monitor progress in reaching MDG 5. The main objective of this study was to the traces the changes in utilization patterns and determinants of safe delivery care services by women in India, during last one and half decade, 1990-2006.  

Methods: Data from three rounds of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), known as the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) in India were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate-pooled logistic regression model were applied to assessing the trends and determinants of safe delivery care services utilization, over one and half decade, 1990-2006 and also fit models stratified by survey periods and with interactions among key socioeconomic predictors to show the extent of disparity in the utilization of safe delivery care services among women belonging to different socioeconomic strata.

Results: The results from analysis indicate that the coverage of safe delivery has increased from 34 percent to 50 percent during the last one and half decade. Overall, it can be said that, there was an improvement in the level of safe deliveries over the period of time. This improvement was somewhere very marginal, but somewhere very pronounced too. The results shows those women’s education, husband’s education, religion, caste, mass media exposure, birth order and interval, wealth quintile and region of residence were found to be statistically significant determinants in the utilization of safe delivery care services. Women from the Southern region utilizing the highest safe delivery care services compared to other regions.

Conclusions: The region specific inequalities, which were greater than the socioeconomic inequalities, may be reduced by expanding outreach health programs to bring services closer to the disadvantaged. Promoting the use of family planning, female education, targeting vulnerable groups such as poor, illiterate, high parity women, involving media and grass root level workers and collaboration between community leaders and health care system could be some important policy level interventions to address the unmet need of safe delivery care services among women. Maternity programmes should be designed keeping in mind the socioeconomic and geographically context, especially women who belongs to EAG states, India.


Keywords


NFHS, Safe delivery, Antenatal care, Pooled data, MDG, Maternal care

Full Text:

PDF

References


Leon D, Walt G. "Poverty, Inequality, and Health in International Perspective: A Divided World?" in Poverty, Inequality and Health, D. Leon, and G. Walt, Editors. 1999, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Wagstaff A. "Poverty and health sector inequalities." Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2002;80(2):97-105.

Krasnik A. "The concept of equity in health services research." Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine. 1996;24(1):2-7.

Evans T, Whitehead M, Diderichsen F, Bhuiya A, Wirth M. eds. Challenging Inequities in Health. From Ethics to Action. 2001, Oxford University Press, New York.

Prasad P. "Health care access and marginalized social spaces. Leptospirosis in South Gujarat." Economic and Political Weekly, 2000;35(41):3688-94.

World Bank, World Development Report 1993. Investing in Health. 1993, Washington DC: Oxford University Press.

WHO, "Pregnancy Exposes Women in poor states to 200-fold risk of death, compared with rich ones, says WHO." Populi, 2000;27(2): 4.

United Nations (2009) UN Millennium Development Goals. Available: http:// www.un.org/ Millennium Goals. Accessed 2010 June 18.

Koblinsky M, Matthews Z, Hussein J, Mavalankar D, Mridha MK, Anwar I. Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering, group. Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1377-86.

Saxena D, Vangani R, Mavalankar DV, Thomsen S. Inequity in maternal health care service utilization in Gujarat: analyses of district-level health survey data. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:1-9.

Tsegay Y, Gebrehiwot T, Goicolea I, Edin K, Lemma H, Sebastian MS. Determinants of antenatal and delivery care utilization in Tigray region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:30.

Rejoice PR, Ravishankar AK. Differentials in Maternal Health Care Service Utilization: Comparative Study between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, World Applied Sciences Journal. 2011;14:1661-9.

Barlett LA, Mawji S, Whitehead S. Where Giving Birth is a Forecast of Death: Maternal mortality in four districts of Afghanistan 1999-2002. The Lancet. 2005;365:864-70.

Kilpatrick JS, Crabtree KE, Kamp A. Preventability of Maternal Deaths: Comparison between Zambian and American referral hospitals, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2002;100:321-6.

Naveentham K, Dharmilngham A. Utilization of Maternal Health Care Services in Southern India, Social Science and Medicine. 2002;55:1849-69.

Basu AM. Mother’s education and childhood mortality: the status of women as a ‘proximate’ proximate determinant. In: L. Visaria, J. Simons, and P. Berman (Eds.), Maternal Education and Child Survival. Delhi:Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. 1997.

Miller BD. The endangered sex: neglect of female children in rural north India, Ithaca and London: University Press. 1981.

Dyson T, Moore M. On kinship, female autonomy and demographic behaviour in India. Population and Development Review. 1983;9:35-60.

International Institute for Population Sciences (1995) National Family Health Survey India, 1992–93 NFHS-1. Mumbai: IIPS.

International Institute for Population Sciences, ORC Macro (2000) National Family Health Survey India, 1998–99 NFHS-2. Mumbai: IIPS.

International Institute for Population Sciences, ORC Macro (2007) National Family Health Survey India, 2005–06 NFHS-3. Mumbai: IIPS.

International Institute for Population Sciences & Macro International (2007) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume II. Mumbai: IIPS.

International Institute for Population Sciences & Macro International (2007) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS.

Mishra V, Roy TK, Retherford RD. Sex differentials in childhood feeding, health care, and nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review. 2004;30:269-95.

Subramanyam MA, Kawachi I, Berkman LF, Subramanian SV. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Childhood Undernutrition in India: Analyzing Trends between 1992 and 2005. PLoS ONE 5: e11392. 2010.

Corsi D, Finlay JE, Subramanian SV. Weight of communities: A multilevel analysis of body mass index in 32,814 neighborhoods in 57 low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Social Science and Medicine. 2012;75:311-22.

Kumar C, Singh PK, Rai RK, Singh L. Early neonatal mortality in India: 1990–2006. Journal of Community Health. 2013;38:120-30.

Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS (2002) Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science

Rao JNK, Scott AJ. On chi-square tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Annals of Statistics. 1984;12:46-60.

Korn EL, Graubard BI. Simultaneous testing of regression coefficients with complex survey data: Use of Bonferroni t statistics. American Statistician. 1990;44:270-6.

Statacorp. Stata statistical software: Release 10. College Station: Statacorp LP. 2007.

Sugathan KS, Mishra V, Retherford RD. Promoting institutional deliveries in rural India: the role of antenatal-care services national family health survey subject reports number 20. International Institute for Population Sciences Mumbai, India & East-West Center, Population and Health Studies Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A. 2001.

Salam A, Siddiqui SA. Socioeconomic inequalities in use of delivery care services in India. Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology of India. 2006;56(2):123-7.

Hazarika I. Factors that determine the use of skilled care during delivery in India: implications for achievement of MDG-5 targets. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2011;15(8):1381-8.

Schuon F. Understanding Islam. World Wisdom Books, Bloomington, Indiana. 1994.

Ellison CG, Levin JS. The religion–health connection: evidence, theory and future directions. Health Education and Behavior. 1998;25(6):700-20.

Chatters LM. Religion and health: Public health research and practice. Annual Review of Public Health. 2000;21:233-67.

Takyi BK. Religion and women’s health in Ghana: Insights into HIV/ AIDS preventive and protective behavior. Social Science & Medicine. 2003;56(6):1221-234.

Shariff A. Socio-economic and demographic differentials between Hindus and Muslims in India. Economic and Political Weekly. 1995;30(46):2947-953.

Basant R. Social, Economic and Educational Conditions of Indian Muslims. Economic and Political Weekly. 2007;42(10):828-32.

Barooah VK, Iyer S. Vidya, Veda and Varna: The influence of religion and caste on education in rural India. Journal of Development Studies. 2005;41(8):1369-1404.

Robinson R. Indian Muslims: The varied dimensions of marginality. Economic and Political Weekly. 2007;42(10):839-43.

Bhaumik SK, Chakrabarty M. Earnings inequality in India: has the rise of caste and religion based politics in India had an impact? Working Paper No. 819, William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan. 2006.

Pande R. Can mandated political representation provide disadvantaged minorities policy influence? theory and evidence from India. American Economic Review. 2003;93(4):1132-51.

Bhagat RB, Praharaj P. Hindu-Muslim fertility differentials. Economic and Political Weekly. 2005;40(5): 411-8.

Bhat PNM, Zavier AJF. Role of religion in fertility decline: The case of Indian Muslims. Economic and Political Weekly. 2005;40(5):385-402.

Kulkarni PM, Alagrajan M. Population growth, fertility and religion in India. Economic and Political Weekly. 2005;40(5):403-10.

Bhalotra S, Valente C, Soest AV. The puzzle of Muslim advantage in child survival in India. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4009. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. 2009.

Bhalotra S, Valente C, Soest AV. Religion and childhood death in India.A. Sharif, R. Basant, eds. the Handbook of Muslims in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. 2009.

Kumar C, Rai RK, Singh PK, Singh L. Socioeconomic Disparities in Maternity Care among Indian Adolescents, 1990–2006. 2013. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69094. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0069094.

Jeffrey C. ‘A Fist Is Stronger than Five Fingers’: Caste and Dominance in Rural North India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Serie. 2001;26(2):217-36.