Knowledge, attitude and practices of patients’ relatives about cancer: a study from Eastern India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20171373Keywords:
Knowledge attitude practice (KAP), Cancer, Family, Illness perception questionnaireAbstract
Background: Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) about a disease can significantly affect healthcare seeking behaviour and thus, ultimate outcome of a disease. This is particularly true in chronic diseases like cancer. In India, the influence of family members on the treatment decision of an individual is paramount. Hence, KAP of the family about a disease will significantly affect the healthcare pathway of any individual. However, actual data on KAP of common people about cancer are very rare from India. In this Eastern Indian study, we aimed to generate data on this very important aspect.
Methods: In this hospital based study, the relatives of cancer patients were interviewed about their perception about various aspects of cancer. The interview was based on a pre-structured questionnaire modelled after the “Illness Perception Questionnaire”.
Results: We had 65 subjects in our study with a mean age of 43.5 years. 32% of the subjects belonged to some profession related to medicine. 44.6% of the subjects thought that cancer was synonymous with tumour. The chief source of information for our respondents was their physician only. Only 5% got their information about cancer from the mass media. The relationship between tobacco and cancer was known to a significant fraction with 21.5% responding that smoking causes cancer and a further 18.5% knowing about other tobacco products as the cause. More than 1/4th of the subjects thought that any cancer was a permanent disease. Most (71%) study subjects thought that living with a cancer patient was difficult. 32% believed that cancer meant inevitable death. Almost 2 out of every 5 had used some form of alternative medicine therapy for cancer. Subjects with lower educational status were statistically more likely to use alternative medicine. Regarding the prevention of cancer also, opinions varied widely according to educational level with almost 70% of the subjects in the illiterate subset opining that cancer is non-preventable.
Conclusions: This study shows that the perception about cancer varied widely in the society according to various factors like educational level and/or gender. A significant number of subjects had personal outlook which was quite different from current scientific data. Hence, proper dissemination of information about diseases like cancer in the society is an important need of the hour.
References
Ghannadi S, Amouzegar A, Amiri P, Karbalaeifar R, Tahmasebinejad Z, Kazempour-Ardebili S. Evaluating the Effect of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Self-Management in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Dialysis. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:3730875.
Hajjaj FM, Salek MS, Basra MKA, Finlay AY. Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice. J R Soc Med. 2010;103:178–87.
Zhang AY, Siminoff LA. The role of the family in treatment decision making by patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30:1022-8.
Hobbs GS, Landrum MB, Arora NK, Ganz PA, van Ryn M, Weeks JC et al. The role of families in decisions regarding cancer treatments. Cancer. 2015;121:1079-87.
Franz CE, Barker JC, Kravitz RL, Flores Y, Krishnan S, Hinton L. Nonmedical influences on the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in dementia care. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21:241-8.
Chadda RK, Deb KS. Indian family systems, collectivistic society and psychotherapy. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55:299-309.
Anon. The Illness Perception Questionnaire. Available from http://www.uib.no/ipq/. Accessed on 3 February 2017.
Jayakrishnan T, Jeeja MC , Kuniyil V, Paramasivam S. Increasing Out-Of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure in India-Due to Supply or Demand? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;1:105.
LoConte NK, Else-Quest NM, Eickhoff J, Hyde J, Schiller JH. Assessment of guilt and shame in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer compared with patients with breast and prostate cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2008;9:171-8.
Kumar D, Goel NK, Pandey AK, Sarpal SS. Complementary and alternative medicine use among the cancer patients in Northern India. South Asian J Cancer. 2016;5:8–11.
Broom A, Nayar K, Tovey P, Shirali R, Thakur R, Seth T, Chhetri P. Indian Cancer Patients' use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) and delays in presentation to Hospital. Oman Med J. 2009;24:99-102.
Nehar JO, Borkan JM, Wilkinson MJB, Reis S, Hermoni D, Hobbs FDR. Doctor patient discussions of alternative medicine for back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2001;19:237-40.
Ali-Risasi C, Mulumba P, Verdonck K, Broeck DV, Praet M. Knowledge, attitude and practice about cancer of the uterine cervix among women living in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo. BMC Women's Health. 2014;14:30.
Hyacinth HI, Adekeye OA, Ibeh JN, Osoba T: Cervical cancer and pap smear awareness and utilization of pap smear test among Federal civil servants in North Central Nigeria. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e46583.
Skinner CS, Gupta S, Bishop WP, Ahn C, Tiro JA, Halm EA et al. Tailored information increases patient/physician discussion of colon cancer risk and testing: The Cancer Risk Intake System trial. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:6-10.
Kulkarni V, Darshan BB, Tandon A, Unnikrishnan B, Iyer S, Kukreja A et al. Awareness and practice regarding cervical cancer prevention among female college students of mangalore city, India. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;8:305-7.
