DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20183888

Evaluation of research skills of medical interns by focus group discussion: a qualitative study in Chennai, India

Ganesh Shanmugasundaram Anusuya, Balaji Arumugam, Sree T. Sucharitha, Karthik R. C., Radhakrishnan A., K. R. S. Sivapriya, Ezhilvanan M.

Abstract


Background: Health research has become an important component of undergraduate medical curriculum. Hence we assessed the research skills of interns who have recently completed the community medicine internship postings.

Methods: It is a qualitative cross sectional study of 32 interns who have completed community medicine internship postings and also have completed a research project during the postings in a private medical college in Chennai. The method of assessment is by focus group discussion. Duration of the study was 10th August to 23rd August 2018. The research skills were graded on a 0 to 9 point ordinal scale. The mean difference in research skills before and after the postings were analysed using paired t test.

Results: 43.8% were males. The mean age was 22 years. 15.6% felt they had research skills even before entering the internship postings. 100% felt they have acquired some kind of research skills after postings. The research skills acquired by the interns were in doing review of literature (50%), sample size calculations (53.1%), methodology (43.8%), questionnaire development (75%), data collection (75%), data entry (53.1%), data analysis under guidance (21.9%), report writing (34.4%), and presentation skills (65.6%). The overall mean increase in research skills before and after the postings was nearly 4.03 (p=0.000). Suggestions given by interns to improve the research activity were giving individual topics (19%), more time (47%) and more guidance (9%).

Conclusions: Our study has shown that a research project done during the community medicine internship postings has helped interns to gain research skills.


Keywords


Research skills, Medical Interns, Focus group discussion, Qualitative study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D, Powers AC. Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med. 2003;51(3):149-56.

William MD, JotzMaitê, Roberto MW, Sabrina MM, Steffi V, Christ M, et al. Interest in research among medical students: Challenges for the undergraduate education. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2016;62(7):652-8.

Research tools: Focus group discussion. Toolkits. 2009. Available at: https://www.odi.org/ publications/5695-focus-group-discussion. Accessed 10 August 2018.

How to Conduct a Successful Focus Group Discussion. 2017. Available at: https://blog. socialcops.com/academy/resources/conduct-successful-focus-group-discussion/. Accessed 10 August 2018.

Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage, UK; 1988.

Morgan DL. Focus Group as qualitative research. Sage, UK; 1988.

Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus Groups: Theory and Practices. Sage, UK; 1990.

Devi V, Abraham RR, Adiga A, Ramnarayan K, Kamath A. Fostering research skills in undergraduate medical students through Mentored Student Projects: Example from an Indian medical school. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2010;8(31):294-8.

Sachdeva S, Sachdev TR, Sachdeva R, Dwivedi N, Taneja N. Published research studies conducted amongst Indian medical undergraduate students: Bibliometric Analysis. Indian J Comm Health. 2017;29(3):287-91.

Bornstein BH, Emler AC. Rationality in medical decision making: a review of the literature on doctors’ decisionmaking biases. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:97-107.

Ghali WA, Saitz R, Eskew AH, Gupta M, Quan H, Hershman WY. Successful teaching in evidence-based medicine. Med Educ. 2000;34:18–22.

Kanter SL, Wimmers PF, Levine AS. In-depth learning: One school’s initiatives to foster integration of ethics, values, and the human dimensions of medicine. Acad Med. 2007;82:405–9.

Schor NF, Troen P, Kanter SL, Levine AS. The Scholarly Project Initiative: Introducing scholarship in medicine through a longitudinal, mentored curricular programme. Acad Med. 2005;80:824–31.

Parsonnet J, Gruppuso PA, Kanter SL, Boninger M. Required vs. elective research and in-depth scholarship programmes in the medical student curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85:405–8.

Green EP, Borkan JM, Pross SH, Adler SR, Nothnagle M, Parsonnet J, et al. Encouraging scholarship: Medical school programmes to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85:409–18.

Bierer SB, Chen HC. How to measure success: The impact of scholarly concentrations on students—A literature review. Acad Med. 2010;85:438–52.

Sowmiya KR, Arumugam B. Summative to Formative Assessment: The Road to Competency Based Education. Ann Int Med Den Res. 2016;2(6):1-4.