DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20184606

Triage for low income countries: is ESI truly the way forward?

Emaduddin Siddiqui, Muhammad Daniyal, Muhammad Abdul Raffay Khan, Saif ul Islam Siddiqui, Zain ul Islam Siddiqui, Walid Farooqi

Abstract


A triage desk at the doorstep of an emergency department (ED) is to “sort, select or prioritize” presenting patients as per their clinical needs. Many triage systems exist globally, however, the need and/or practical applicability of any triage is dictated by the hospital system and setting. In low-income/developing countries, the triage system must be capable and proficient enough to pair the right patient with the most appropriate management. Ineffective and/or in-efficient triage leads to overcrowding, delays, inappropriate resource utilization and patient dissatisfaction. A sizeable proportion of triage systems rely on three to five levels/tiers. Five level triage systems, such as the Australian Triage System (ATS) and the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS), to name a few, are widely used worldwide. Based on door-to-physician time, these systems not only allow the institution to monitor and meet the timelines recommended by the institution policies, but have also been identified as an effective triage tool hence widely adopted in hospitals of developed countries. However, both ATS and CTAS are time-consuming and require skilled and qualified nursing staff to process it. On the other hand, the ESI (Emergency Severity Index) scale which is also a 5-level triage system, categorizes patients based on resource requirement and severity of the patient’s condition. Although ESI is in the developing phase, it is proving to be nurse-friendly and reliable in both intra and inter-rated conditions. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the merits and pitfalls of the ESI system, in addition to proposing further modifications, in order to fulfill the needs of a developing country.

Keywords


ESI, Nursing friendly triage, Low income countries

Full Text:

PDF

References


Siddiqui E. Emergency Triage: Extend of our knowledge. J Pakistan Med Assoc. 2012;62(8):839.

Gilboy N, Travers D, Wuerz R. Re-evaluating triage in the new millennium: a comprehensive look at the need for standardization and quality. J Emerg Nursing. 1999;25(6):468-73.

Fernandes CB, Groth SJ, Johnson LA, Rosenau AM, Sumner JQA, Begley D, et al. A Uniform Triage Scale in Emergency Medicine Information Paper. Developed by the Subcommittee on National Triage Scale Emergency Medicine Practice Committee, 1999. Available at: https://pdfs. semanticscholar.org/d179/093b80e48f245babaf2853742371091d8e9b.pdf. Accessed on 17 December 2017.

Jelinek GA, Little M. Inter‐rater reliability of the National Triage Scale over 11,500 simulated occasions of triage. Emergy Med. 1996;8(4):226-30.

Parenti N, Ferrara L, Reggiani MLB, Sangiorgi D, Lenzi T. Reliability and validity of two four-level emergency triage systems. Eur J of Emerg Med. 2009;16(3):115-20.

Taboulet P, Moreira V, Haas L, Porcher R, Braganca A, Fontaine JP, et al. Triage with the French Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale: reliability and validity. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009;16(2):61-7.

Widgren BR, Jourak M. Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System (METTS): A new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(6):623-8.

FitzGerald G. Emergency department triage [thesis]. Queensland, Australia: Univ Queensland. 1989.

Jill M, Baren SG, John A. Brennan, Lance Brown. Pediatric Emerg Med. China: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.

Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y. Emergency department triage: an ethical analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11(1):16.

Policy on the Australasian Triage Scale. 2013 Jul-13-2013. Report No: Contract No: 04

Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int. 2010;107(50):892.

FitzGerald G, Jelinek GA, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Republished paper: Emergency department triage revisited. Postgraduate Med J. 2010;86(1018):502-8.

Mackway-Jones K, Marsden J, Windle J. Emergency triage: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

Pardey TGM. The clinical practice of Emergency Department Triage: Application of the Australasian Triage Scale—An extended literature review: Part I: Evolution of the ATS. Australasian Emerg Nurs J. 2006;9(4):155-62.

Gilboy N, Tanabe T, Travers D. Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A triage tool for emergency department. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www ahrq gov/professionals/systems/hospital/esi/esi1.html. Accessed on 3 December 2011.

Mahmoodian F, Eqtesadi R, Ghareghani A. Waiting Times in Emergency Department After Using the Emergency Severity Index Triage Tool. Arch Trauma Res. 2014;3(4).

Horwitz LI, Green J, Bradley EH. US emergency department performance on wait time and length of visit. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(2):133-41.

Singer RF, Infante AA, Oppenheimer CC, West CA, Siegel B. The use of and satisfaction with the Emergency Severity Index. J Emerg Nurs. 2012;38(2):120-6.

Mahajan V, Arora S, Kaur T, Gupta S, Guglani V. Unexpected Hospitalisations at a 23-Hour Observation Unit in a Paediatric Emergency Department of Northern India. J Clin Diagnos Res. 2013;7(7):1418.

Helath policy priorities principal committee - Report. 2011 June 2011. Report No.

Mirhaghi A, Kooshiar H, Esmaeili H, Ebrahimi M. Outcomes for emergency severity index triage implementation in the emergency department. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):4-7.

McHugh M, Tanabe P, McClelland M, Khare RK. More patients are triaged using the Emergency Severity Index than any other triage acuity system in the United States. Academic Emerg Med. 2012;19(1):106-9.

Choi M, Kim J, Choi H, Lee J, Shin S, Kim D, et al. 305: Reliability of Emergency Severity Index Version 4. Annals of Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):95-6.

Grossmann FF, Nickel CH, Christ M, Schneider K, Spirig R, Bingisser R. Transporting clinical tools to new settings: cultural adaptation and validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German. Annals of Emerg Med. 2011;57(3):257-64.

Chi C-H, Huang C-M. Comparison of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Taiwan Triage System in predicting resource utilization. J Formosan Med Assoc. 2006;105(8):617-25.

Tanabe P, Gimbel R, Yarnold PR, Adams JG. The Emergency Severity Index (version 3) 5-level triage system scores predict ED resource consumption. J Emerg Nurs. 2004;30(1):22-9.

Kyranou M, Chouta A, Georgiadis G, Oulousidis D, Tsiviki A. Implementing the Emergency Severity Index Triage System in the Homeland of Hippocrates. J Emerg Nurs. 2005;31(5):428.

Wuerz R. Emergency severity index triage category is associated with six‐month survival. Academic Emerg Med. 2001;8(1):61-4.