DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20184018

Prevalence of undetected refractive errors among school children: a cross sectional study in urban Etawah, India

Neha Sachan, Dhiraj Srivastava, P. K. Jain, Prashant Kumar Bajpai, Santosh Kumar Singh, Jyoti Mehra

Abstract


Background: Refractive error is the most common cause of blindness which can be corrected easily. Uncorrected refractive errors are responsible for about 19.7% of blindness in India. The aim and objectives of the study were to find out the prevalence of undetected refractive errors in school children and to find out associated factors related to it.

Methods: This was a cross sectional study in which school children studying in class 5th to 11th were included. Vision of all the children was checked by using Snellen’s chart. The responses were recorded on a pre-designed and pre-tested questionnaire. Data entry was done in MS-EXCEL sheet and analysis was done by using SPSS-23.

Results: There are total 350 students out of which 200 (57%) are males and 150 (43%) are females. The undetected refractive error is present in 12% males and 15.3% females. Thus, 47 out of 350 (13.4%) of the children had prevalence of undetected refractive errors.

Conclusions: It is recommended that adequate preschool examination of the children be made mandatory as a part of the admission policy of all the schools. In addition, there should be periodic examination of the school children at least on annual basis.


Keywords


Undetected refractive error, Blindness, Snellen’s chart

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kantha GP, Sethi S. Prevalence of refractive errors in school children (12–17 years) of Ahmedabad city. Indian J Community Med. 1987;24(4):1928-31.

Holden BA, Sulaiman S, Knox K. The Challenge of Providing Spectacles in the Developing World. J Community Eye Health. 2000;13(33):910.

Park K, Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 24th ed. 2017; Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2017: 420.

Parajasegram R. Vision 2020. The Right to Sight: from strategies to action. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:359-60.

Fan DS, Lam DS, Lam RF, Lau JT, Chong KS, Cheung EY, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and progression of myopia of school children in Hong Kong. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004:45(4):1071-5.

Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R, Li F, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. The progression of refractive error in school-age children:Shynyi district, China. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134(5):735-43.

Pointer JS. A 6-year longitudinal optometric study of the refractive trend in school-aged children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21(5):361-7.

Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsaio CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren. 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(1):27-33.

National Committee for Prevention of Blindness, Ministry of Health, Special Education and Social Welfare, Islamabad, Pakistan, National Programme for Prevention of Blindness: First five year Plan; 1994-98: 24.

The Framingham Offspring Eye Study Group, Familial Aggregation and Prevalence of Myopia in The Framingham Offspring. Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:326-32.

Zadnik K, Satariamo WA, Mutti DO. The effects of parental H/o myopia on children eye size. JAMA. 1994;271:1323-7.

Zadnik K. The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture (1995). Myopia development in childhood. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74 (8):603-8.

Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, Jones LA, Zadnik K. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(12):3633-40.

Saw SM, Zhang MZ, Hong RZ, Fu ZF, Pang MH, Tan DT. Near-work activity, night-lights, and myopia in the Singapore-China study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(5):620-7.

Calvas P, Naiglin L, Gazagne C, Dallongeville F, Thalamas C, Idder A, et al. A genome wide scan for familial high myopia suggests a novel locus on chromosome 7q36. J Med Genet. 2002;39:118-24.

Paluru P, Ronan SM, Heon E, Devoto M, Wildenberg SC, Scavello G, et al. New locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to the long arm of chromosome 17. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44 (5):1830-6.

Feldkamper M, Schaeffel F. Interactions of genes and environment in myopia. Dev Ophthalmol. 2003;37:34-49.

Seet B, Wong TY, Tan DT, Saw SM, Balakrishnan V, Lee L, et al. Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:521-6.

Ghosh S, Maji D, Bhaduri G, Mukhopadhya U. (2008-2009) in their study on visual impairment in urban school children (6years- 14 years) of low income families in Kolkata, found the prevalence of refractive error to be 14.7% with 11.9% myopia and 2.5% hypermetropia.

Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, Jones LA, Zadnik K. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(12):3633-40.

Ali A, Ahmad I, Ayub S. Prevalence of Undetected Refractive Errors among School Children. Biomedica. 2007;23:96-101.

Afghani T, Vine HA, Bhatti A, Qadir MS, Akhtar J, Tehzib M, Al-Shifa-Al-Noor (ASAN) refractive error study of one million school children. Pakistan J Ophthalmol. 2003;19(4):101-7.

Sharma S, Vashisht BM, Kan M, Goel M. Magnitude of Refractive Errors among school children in a rural block of Haryana. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;6(2):1-5.