DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20182597

Perception and preferences of teaching and learning methods in community medicine: a cross sectional study

Krishna Prakash Joshi, M. Robins, M. Yanadi Reddy

Abstract


Background: Knowledge of community medicine plays a very important role in proper and effective delivery of health care services to the society. Every teacher has her or his own style of teaching and now teachers are adjusting their approach depending on their students’ learning needs. The aims and objectives of the study were to assess the perception of 3rd year medical students towards teaching and learning methods in community medicine & to know their preferences among various commonly used teaching learning media & methods.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire-based study was conducted among 3rd year medical students (6th semester) of SVS Medical College, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India. A pre-designed, pre-tested self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. Most of the responses were collected as MCQs type & Likert five point scale. The data was analyzed by calculating percentage.

Results: Out of total 140 participants 42 (30%) were boys and 98 (70%) were girls. All were within the age group of 21-24years. Regarding the preference of teaching aid, PPT was preferred by maximum 37% participants followed by combination of CB & PPT (30%), Chalk & board (29%). Student’s preference about current T-L methods shows that maximum participants preferred. SGD (34%), followed by interactive lectures (26%). Around 65% students were satisfied & 20% were strongly satisfied with current learning approaches.

Conclusions: Small group discussion and blended or interactive teaching are the most preferred learning method when compared with traditional teaching methods indicating that students are more interested in active teaching and learning methods.


Keywords


Perceptions, Preferences, T-L AID, T-L Method, SGD, PPT, CB

Full Text:

PDF

References


MCI Vision 2015: 14-15. Available at: https://old.mciindia.org/tools/announcement/MCI_booklet.pdf. Accessed on 19 May on 2017.

Meguid EA, Collins M. Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:229–41.

Ruth N. Communicating student evaluation of teaching results: rating interpretation guides (RIG's). Assessment Evaluation in Higher Educ. 2000;25:121-34.

Richardson BK. Feedback. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(12):1-5.

Shoaib R, Hasaan R. Students feedback on teaching and assessment at Nishtar Medical College. Multan, J Pakistan Med Association, September 2013: Available at: http://www.jpma.org.pk/full_article_ text.php?article_id =4651. Accessed on 19 May on 2017.

Aregbeyen O. Students perceptions of effective teaching and effective lecturer characteristics at the University of Ibadan Nigeria. Pakistan J Social Sci. 2010;7(2):62- 9.

Manu G, Padmanabha TS, Chandrakantha T, Neha K. Perception and preferences of teaching and learning methods among 2nd year medical students: a cross sectional survey in a rural tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2016;5:1006-10.

Guidelines for Preventive and Social Medicine/ Community Medicine/Community Health Curriculum in the Undergraduate Medical Education, World Health Organization SEA-HSD-325. New Delhi. 2010; p4. Available at: http://apps.searo.who.int/PDS_DOCS/B4451.pdf. Accessed on 20/05/2017.

Mukhopadhyay DK. Students' perception of quality of medical education in a medical college in west Bengal, India. Indian J Public Health. 2016;60:4-9.

Sharma R, Yadav SM, Joshi SM, Kaushik PB. Students’ perception of teaching-learning methods in Community Medicine at a Government Medical College in Rajasthan. Indian J Comm Health. 2017;29(2):145-50.

Chadlawada U. Training PSM Students in Clinico Social Case Discussion through Semi Structured Small Group Technique, NTTC Bulletin. 2013;20(1):1.

Basu M, Das P, Chowdhury G. Introducing integrated teaching and comparison with traditional teaching in undergraduate medical curriculum: A pilot study. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2015;8:431-8.