DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20182969

Non-use of Janani Avam Bal Suraksha Yojana in a district of Bihar: ensuring safe deliveries needs strategy modification

Madhumita Mukherjee, Rashmi Singh, Amrita Mukherjee, Madhulekha Bhattacharya

Abstract


Background: India’s Janany Surakhsha Yojana (JSY) is the largest conditional cash transfer (CCT) program in the world in terms of the number of beneficiaries - covering about 9·5 million (36%) of 26 million women giving birth in India. Eleven States/UTs including Bihar, are still below the National estimate for institutional delivery of 78.9% (NFHS 4). In this study we attempted to find out the status of institutional and home deliveries in district Arwal of Bihar and reasons why in spite of cash incentives a proportion of mothers are opting for home delivery.

Methods: A cross sectional descriptive design was used to interview 407 women, who had given birth to a child in previous one year. Focuss group discussions was held with community and health staff to corroborate the interview data.

Results: Fifty nine percent of mothers were found to have preferred home delivery over institutional one. Reasons which came to light were home deliveries are cheaper (24.1%), unawareness about JSY (22%), unavailability of transport to reach hospital (22%) and better care being taken at home delivery (20.1%) variables. Older age, having a BPL card, and literacy of husband were found as favoring institutional delivery whereas dissatisfaction during a previous abortion or a livebirth in hospital were both associated with non-use.

Conclusions: Better client awareness, strengthening of public health infrastructure, availability of skilled birth attendants at health subcentres (HSCs) and emergency transport in time can reduce number of home deliveries and lead to success of JBSY programme and subsequent reduction in maternal morbidity and mortality.


Keywords


Home delivery, Incentives, Quality of care, Transport

Full Text:

PDF

References


Malik JS, Kalhan M, Punia A, Behera BK. Utilization of financial assistance under Janani Suraksha Yojna in Rural North India. Niger J Basic Clin Sci. 2013;10:8-12.

Aiyar Y. Centre for Policy Research; “Weak Implementation, Ailing Health Care Plan.” Health Economics, February 11, 2010.

National Family Health Survey, India - NFHS4; Available at: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs4. shtml. Accessed on 23 December 2017.

Twelfth five year plan (2012/2017)/Planning Commission, Government of India. Volumes at planningcommission.gov.in/plans/panel/12thplan/pdf/12fyp_vol2. Accessed on 23 December 2017.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, I. National Rural Health Mission Meeting people’s health needs in rural areas Framework for Implementation 2005-2012. 2012. Available at: http://www.nipccd-earchive.wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/PDF/NRHM%20-%20Framework%20for%20Implementation %20-%20%202005-MOHFW.pdf Accessed on 23 December 2017.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, I. National Health Policy 2017. Available at: http://cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/National-Health-Policy.pdf. Accessed on 23 December 2017.

Salam A, Siddiqui SA. Socioeconomic inequalities in use of delivery care services in India. J Obstetr Gynecol India. 2006;56(2):5.

UNFPA. Concurrent Assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY)in Selected States. 2009. Available at: http://india.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/JSYConcurrentAssessment.pdf. Accessed on 23 December 2017.

Kaushik A, Mishra CP, Kesharwani P, Richa, Hussain MA. Awareness about JSY among reproductive age women in a rural area of Varanasi. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2010;41(3-4):4.

Kumar V, Kaushal SK, Gupta SC, Maroof KA. Janani Suraksha Yojana: Its utilization and perception among mothers and health care providers in a rural area of North India. Int J Med Public Health. 2015;5(2):4.

Salve P. Where The Government’s Flagship Schemes Really Fail. 2013. Available from: http://www.indiaspend.com/sectors/where-the-governments-flagship-schemes-really-fail. Accessed on 23 December 2017.

Silan V, Kant S, Archana S, Mishra P, Rizwan S. Determinants of underutilisation of free delivery services in an area with high institutional delivery rate: a qualitative study. N Am J Med Sci, 2014;6(7):315-20.

Singh R, Mukherjee M, Datta U, Dhingra R, Tiwary VK, Nandan D. An evaluation of the referral transport system of Patna, Bihar. Indian J Public Health. 2009;53(3):143-6.

Tenth Common review mission report,2016 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, Nirman Bhawan New Delhi-110 011.

Iyengar SD, Iyengar V, Suhalka V, Agrawal K. Comparison of domiciliary and institutional delivery-care practices in rural Rajasthan, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(2):303-12.

Peabody JW, Taguibalo MM, Robalino DA, Frenk J. Improving the Quality of Care in Developing Countries, in Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries,. 2006, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington (DC).

Singh HS, Tamulee P. Janani Surasksha Yojana: Impact on Socio-Economic Conditions among Beneficiary Families. International J Sci Res Publications. 2012;2(10):4.

Sharma B, Giri G, Christensson E., Johansson E. The transition of childbirth practices among tribal women in Gujarat, India - a grounded theory approach. BMC Int Health Human Rights. 2013;13:41.