DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20181410

A KAP study on snake bite among the rural population in Tirunelveli district

Krishnaleela G., Selva Meena M., Praveena Daya A.

Abstract


Background: India has 236 species of snakes of which 13 species are poisonous. Most of the Indian population are in rural area and they are poorly informed about the snake bite. They waste their vital time by reporting to traditional healers and taking inappropriate first aid. So the present study is done to determine the knowledge, attitude and practice on snake bite among the rural population of Tirunelveli district.

Methods: A cross–sectional study was done in rural area of Tirunelveli district. 200 adults were included in our study. Data on knowledge, attitude and practice were collected by the trained personnel using a predesigned structured questionnaire for the period of three months from June 2017 to August 2017.

Results: 60.5% of the study population can’t identify the snake. 54% of them had knowledge on availability of ASV.62% of study subjects had no knowledge on complications of snake bite. It was also found that most of them had practice of tying tourniquet above the site of bite, sucking blood from the site, washing with soap and water. 62.5% preferred hospital treatment for snake bite only 12% preferred traditional practices and 59.5% believed that ASV is effective.

Conclusions: Knowledge on identification of snake and on ASV is low and still some people follow harmful practices like taking to traditional healers and applying native medicine so steps must be taken to improve their knowledge and to prevent harmful practices.


Keywords


Snake bite, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, ASV

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chippaux JP. Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(5):515-24.

Ratanabanangkoon K, Tan KY, Eursakun S, Tan CH, Simsiriwong P, Pamornsakda T, et al. A simple and novel strategy for the production of a pan-specific antiserum against elapid snakes of Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004565.

Warrell DA. Snake bite. Lancet. 2010;375:77–88.

Alirol E, Sharma SK, Bawaskar HS, Kuch U, Chappuis F. Snake bite in South Asia: A review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e603.

Wasko DK, Bullard SG. An analysis of media-reported venomous snakebites in the United States, 2011–2013. Wilderness Environ Med. 2016;27:219–26.

Spyres MB, Ruha AM, Seifert S, Onisko N, Padilla-Jones A, Smith EA. Occupational snake bites: A prospective case series of patients reported to the Toxic North American Snakebite Registry. J. Med. Toxicol. Off. J Am Coll Med Toxicol. 2016;12:365–9.

Murdock RT, White GL Jr, Pedersen DM, DeFaller JM, Snyder CC. Prevention and emergency field management of venomous snakebites during military exercises. Mil Med. 1990;155:587–90.

Kasturiratne A, Wickramsinghe AR, DeSilva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeshwaran A, Premarathna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLOS Med.2008;5:218.

Warrell DA. WHO/SEARO Guidelines for the Clinical Management of Snakebite in the Southeast Asian Region. SE Asian J Trop Med Pub Health. 1999;30:1-85.

Keooudom A, Strobe M. Snake bites in rural Laos: a neglected problem. Available at http://www.tm.mahidol.ac.th/jitmm2008/download/14102008-jitmm-d5-Keooudom-snake-bite.pdf. Accessed on 23 January 2018.

Silva, Marikar F, Murugananthan A, Agampodi S. Awareness and perceptions on prevention, first aid and treatment of snakebites among Sri Lankan farmers: a knowledge practice mismatch? J Occupational Med Toxicol. 2014;9:20.

Kumar A, Dasgupta A, Biswas D, Sahoo SK, Das S, Preeti PS. Knowledge regarding snake bite in rural Bengal – Are they still lingering on myths and misconceptions? IAIM. 2015;2(7):36-41.